Field Results

The case studies, with the context they deserve.

Every example below comes from a specific crop, system, and set of conditions. Each one is presented at the level of confidence it actually supports.

We organize the proof by what it actually proves.

Field evidence varies in quality. A replicated trial designed by a third party tells you something different from a grower's two-season observation, which tells you something different from a six-week pilot.

We don't pretend they're the same.

The case studies below are sorted into four tiers. Each tier is labeled clearly so you know what level of confidence the result carries. We've also flagged the conditions, the protocol, the comparison, and the limits of what each example proves.

This is more useful than the alternative, which is dressing everything up as if it carried the same weight. Serious growers and advisors see through that. They appreciate the honesty more than they appreciate the marketing.

The Four Tiers

Tier 1

Commercial cultivation reports. Documented protocol, measured outcomes, commercial scale.

Tier 2

Field trials & side-by-side comparisons. Defined control plots, measured results, single-farm specificity.

Tier 3

Grower-reported case studies. Direct observations from the grower, typically over a full season or longer, with photos or measurements where available.

Tier 4

Ongoing pilots & field observations. Active studies, anecdotal field observations, and supporting reference points where the evidence is suggestive but not yet quantified.

Tier 1

Commercial cultivation reports.

Documented protocol, measured outcomes, at commercial scale. The highest confidence tier on this page.

PLACEHOLDER
placeholder-canna-tech-cannabis.jpg
4:5 portrait, 600×750
Alt: "Cannabis clone with developed taproot system at Canna-Tech propagation facility"
CANNABIS PROPAGATION — PHOENIX, ARIZONA

Plant stress reduced from 25% to under 3%. Root development time cut by a third.

Crop
Cannabis (propagation stage)
Operation
Canna-Tech
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
System
Hydroponic (rockwool propagation)
Trial duration
Cloning, propagation, early vegetative
Product
Pure-CV Hydro
Application
Weekly hand-drench

The Challenge

The grower had reasonable concerns about introducing a microalgae-based biostimulant into a hydroponic system: algae buildup in rockwool, biofilm in irrigation lines, clogging, moisture issues, nutrient availability, salt buildup, and weaker clone stems. The propagation phase is where these concerns matter most because the consequences cascade into the rest of the cycle.

The Result

Plant browning and stress reduced from approximately 25% of plants affected to less than 3%. Root development time improved from 14 to 21 days to 10 to 15 days. Taproot formation observed consistently in 5 to 7 days. Vegetative stage shortened from four weeks to three to three-and-a-half weeks, with some strains at two-and-a-half weeks. No biofilm or irrigation clogging was observed during the report period.

What This Proves, and What It Doesn't

Commercial cultivation efficiency report. The strain, system, propagation protocol, and operator practices matter. Other cannabis propagation operations should evaluate Pure-CV Hydro in their own system before committing to large-scale integration.

Tier 2

Field trials and side-by-side comparisons.

Defined control plots, measured results, single-farm specificity.

PLACEHOLDER
placeholder-yukon-gold-potatoes.jpg
4:5 portrait, 600×750
Alt: "Yukon Gold potatoes from coastal South Carolina field trial showing Pure CV treated vs. compost-treated comparison"
YUKON GOLD POTATOES — COASTAL SOUTH CAROLINA

300% more weight than untreated. 413% more than compost-only.

Crop
Yukon Gold potatoes
Operation
Not publicly named
Location
Coastal South Carolina
System
Outdoor field, sandy loam (Seabrook)
Trial duration
Full growing cycle
Product
Pure CV
Application
1:10 dilution as soil amendment
Comparison
Pure CV vs untreated vs compost-only

The Challenge

The trial was designed to compare Pure CV as a soil amendment against both an untreated control group and a compost-treated group on Yukon Gold potatoes. The plot was irrigated at least twice weekly for two to four hours per period, with an average flow rate of 3.63 gallons per minute.

The Result

Pure CV-treated Yukon Gold potato plants yielded 300% more weight than untreated potatoes and 413% more weight than the compost-only comparison group. The largest Pure CV-treated potato weighed 42 grams more than the largest compost-treated potato and 30 grams more than the largest untreated potato.

What This Proves, and What It Doesn't

A specific Yukon Gold potato field trial under specific conditions: sandy loam soil, coastal South Carolina climate, defined irrigation regime, and a single growing cycle. Not a universal claim across all potato production or all soil types. The 413% comparison is to a compost-only group, not to a chemical fertilizer baseline.

PLACEHOLDER
placeholder-briar-view-wheat.jpg
4:5 portrait, 600×750
Alt: "Winter wheat field comparison at Briar View Farms"
WINTER WHEAT — BRIAR VIEW FARMS

72 bushels per acre on the treated plot. 60 on the control.

Crop
Winter wheat
Operation
Briar View Farms
Location
Briar View Farms
System
No-till, post-glyphosate burn-down
Trial duration
November to harvest
Product
Pure CV
Application
Two applications: November and March
Comparison
5.37 acres treated vs 4.95 control

The Challenge

The grower wanted to determine whether adding Pure CV during the winter wheat growing cycle could improve soil health and yield. The field had previously been used for row crops including tobacco, then converted to hay for approximately 15 years. In November, the field was sprayed with glyphosate as a burn-down, soil samples were taken, and wheat was no-tilled into the soil. Pure CV was applied in the third week of November, with a second application in mid-March alongside the standard liquid nitrogen.

The Result

The 4.95-acre control plot yielded 60 bushels per acre. The 5.37-acre Pure CV-treated plot averaged 72 bushels per acre. Same farm, adjacent plots, same nitrogen program, same growing season.

What This Proves, and What It Doesn't

A single-farm side-by-side comparison on a specific field with a specific recent history. Not a universal claim for winter wheat across all geographies, soil types, or rotation histories. Replication on other operations is needed before generalizing.

Tier 3

Grower-reported case studies.

Direct observations from the grower, typically over a full season or longer. Reported in good faith, presented as field observations rather than replicated trials.

PLACEHOLDER
placeholder-revis-tomato.jpg
4:5 portrait, 600×750
Source note: original materials reportedly include tomato photos at 32 & 49 days post-harvest
TOMATO POST-HARVEST QUALITY — REVIS FARMS

Tomato quality and shelf life extended by several weeks post-harvest.

Crop
Tomato
Operation
Revis Farms
Location
Revis Farms
System
Irrigation-applied
Trial duration
Production cycle + post-harvest storage
Product
Pure CV
Application
25 ml/gal via irrigation, biweekly

The Challenge

The client wanted to test Pure CV freshwater microalgae blends as an alternative to chemical fertilizer and determine whether the product had an effect on post-harvest tomato shelf life.

The Result

The client reported a significant effect on tomato health and quality after harvest. Quality and shelf life were extended by several weeks. Supporting photos showed tomatoes at 32 days post-harvest and a sliced tomato at 49 days post-harvest.

What This Proves, and What It Doesn't

Client-observed shelf-life extension pending third-party lab verification. A meaningful signal worth replicating, but not a guaranteed claim across other tomato varieties, storage conditions, or operations.

PLACEHOLDER
placeholder-bugenhagen-blueberries.jpg
4:5 portrait, 600×750
BLUEBERRIES — TWO-SEASON OBSERVATION

20-30% more fruit, by the grower's observation. Stronger plants, less pest pressure.

Crop
Blueberry bushes
Grower
William Bugenhagen
Location
Not specified
System
Outdoor, mature + freshly planted
Trial duration
2020 and 2021 growing seasons
Product
Pure CV-50
Application
1:20 with well water, biweekly. Foliar (until pre-picking) + soil

The Challenge

The grower wanted to compare treated and untreated blueberry bushes across two growing seasons, including both freshly planted bushes and mature plants. The trial used Pure CV-50 at 1 part product to 20 parts well water, applied every two weeks. Foliar application continued until just before picking time. Soil application continued throughout both seasons.

The Result

The grower reported treated blueberries were more plentiful, darker in color, firmer, and more flavorful, with approximately 20 to 30% more fruit compared to untreated plants. He also observed thicker leaves, stronger plant growth, and less pest pressure on the treated bushes. Freshly planted treated bushes produced fruit in year two. Freshly planted untreated bushes did not.

What This Proves, and What It Doesn't

A two-season grower-reported field experience, not a replicated university study. The 20 to 30% fruit increase is the grower's observation rather than a measured laboratory comparison. Other blueberry operations should validate the approach on a portion of their planting before scaling.

USE REAL ASSET
Troy, NC squash photo
4:5 crop, focus on densest foliage
Apply 10–15% warm filter
SQUASH — TROY, NORTH CAROLINA

Two-to-three times bigger and fuller plants compared to the horse-manure-and-topsoil comparison.

Crop
Squash
Grower
Troy
Location
North Carolina
System
Outdoor garden
Trial duration
Growing cycle
Product
EcoFlourish
Application
Two applications: at planting + bloom
Comparison
EcoFlourish vs horse manure + topsoil

The Challenge

Troy ran an informal but direct comparison of squash plants treated with EcoFlourish against squash grown with horse manure and topsoil. He applied EcoFlourish twice: once at planting, and again when blooms started.

The Result

Troy reported that the EcoFlourish-treated plants were two to three times bigger and fuller than the comparison group, with visibly stronger foliage and plant structure across the growing cycle.

What This Proves, and What It Doesn't

A grower-reported field observation from a small-plot comparison. Not a measured trial. Useful as a real-world directional indicator, especially for high-value vegetable production in similar conditions.

PLACEHOLDER
placeholder-cabbage-recovery.jpg
4:5 portrait, 600×750
CABBAGE HAIL RECOVERY — MIDWEST

Approximately 25% yield recovery on a crop that would otherwise have been largely lost.

Crop
Cabbage
Grower
Anonymized at grower's request
Location
Midwest
System
Outdoor production
Event
Late-season hail damage
Product
Pure CV
Application
Rescue application after the event

The Challenge

A Midwest produce grower's cabbage crop suffered late-season hail damage. The crop appeared largely lost. A rescue application of Pure CV was applied in an attempt to support plant recovery.

The Result

The grower reported approximately 25% yield recovery on a crop that would otherwise have been largely or entirely written off. The application reportedly contributed to improved crop health following the stress event.

What This Proves, and What It Doesn't

Field observation from a single rescue application. We do not present this as a guaranteed result for hail or stress-event recovery. We present it as one of the reasons growers in high-value, weather-exposed operations have requested EcoFlourish as a contingency tool.

Tier 4

Ongoing pilots and field observations.

Active studies, anecdotal field observations, and supporting reference points. The evidence is suggestive but not yet fully quantified.

PLACEHOLDER
placeholder-jamaica-scotch-bonnet.jpg
4:5 portrait, 600×750
SCOTCH BONNET PEPPERS — TRELAWNEY, JAMAICA

Enhanced root mass, healthier fruit, increased resilience to heat and variable rainfall.

Crop
Scotch Bonnet peppers
Partner
Hampshire Agriculture Company
Location
Trelawney, Jamaica
System
Outdoor field, tropical conditions
Trial duration
Six-week comparison (ongoing pilot)
Product
EcoFlourish

The Challenge

EcoFlourish was evaluated under real-world Jamaican agricultural conditions for high-value Scotch Bonnet pepper production. The focus was on plant health, root development, crop uniformity, nutrient absorption, and resilience to heat stress and variable rainfall.

The Result

The study materials report enhanced root mass development, improved nutrient absorption, healthier fruit formation and consistency, increased resilience to heat stress and variable rainfall, and potential for higher yields and improved crop uniformity. Comparison photos show stronger, fuller treated plants versus smaller untreated plants over the six-week observation window.

What This Proves, and What It Doesn't

Ongoing field study and pilot validation. We do not present quantified yield claims until measured harvest data is available. The signal is encouraging enough to warrant continued evaluation under similar tropical agricultural conditions.

PLACEHOLDER
placeholder-mixed-site-testing.jpg
4:5 portrait, 600×750
MIXED-SITE TESTING — AZALEAS, BEANS, PEPPERS, JALAPENOS

Approximately 50% higher bean yield. Peppers 35% longer. Jalapenos resisted hornworm damage in the treated group.

Plants tested
Azaleas, beans, peppers, jalapenos
Sites
Multiple, mixed soil + climate
Trial duration
Growing cycles
Product
Pure CV
Application
2 oz per gallon, biweekly
Comparison
Treated vs untreated

The Challenge

The purpose of this testing was to observe Pure CV performance across mixed soil types, temperature conditions, test sizes, and growing conditions, on a range of ornamental and vegetable crops.

The Result

Treated azaleas were observed blooming earlier than untreated plants. Harvested peppers in the treated group were approximately 35% longer than untreated peppers. Bean plants showed a large size difference and approximately 50% higher yield at harvest. Treated jalapeno plants showed larger growth, while untreated jalapenos were damaged by hornworms during the same period.

What This Proves, and What It Doesn't

Supporting visual field-observation evidence across multiple plant types. Not a formal replicated study. The differential observations on jalapeno hornworm damage are notable but should not be interpreted as a pesticidal claim for EcoFlourish.

The Category-Level Foundation

EcoFlourish sits on a body of freshwater microalgae research that goes back decades.

Chlorella vulgaris has been studied as a soil amendment, foliar input, and biostimulant across European and Asian agriculture for years. Peer-reviewed research has documented effects on plant growth, root development, nutrient utilization, crop yield, and post-harvest characteristics across multiple species. Published trials include work on lettuce, strawberries, grapevines, wheat, and other crops.

One example often referenced in the category is the 2018 Sweetgrass Garden trial in coastal South Carolina, conducted by Jaime Randise, MS and George J. Taylor, MD, which evaluated Chlorella vulgaris (cultivated by Barron Algae) as a soil amendment. The trial reported a 50% increase in collard greens biomass and a 168% increase in Blue Lake Bush bean weight in algae-treated plots over a 74-day cycle, with results meeting standard statistical significance.

We reference this kind of work as part of the broader Chlorella vulgaris scientific category, not as a product-identity claim for EcoFlourish. EcoFlourish powered by Pure CV is a refined and concentrated freshwater microalgae formulation built on this category of science. The product-specific evidence is the case study set above.

This distinction is important. We treat the category research as foundation, and the product evidence as the actual basis for any operational decision about EcoFlourish.

The Category Research Base

Decades of published research on Chlorella vulgaris in:

Soil biology and amendment
Plant biostimulation
Root development
Nutrient utilization
Post-harvest characteristics


Geographic application across European, Asian, and Americas agriculture.


Field trial work on lettuce, strawberries, grapevines, wheat, collards, beans, and more.

At a Glance

All nine case studies, summarized.

For quick reference and side-by-side review.

Tier Crop / Operation Location Headline Result Tier Label
1 Cannabis — Canna-Tech Phoenix, AZ Stress 25% → <3%. Root time cut by a third. Commercial cultivation report
2 Yukon Gold Potatoes Coastal SC 300% over untreated. 413% over compost-only. Field trial, single-farm
2 Winter Wheat — Briar View Briar View Farms 72 bu/ac treated vs 60 control. Side-by-side comparison
3 Tomato — Revis Farms Revis Farms Shelf life extended by several weeks. Grower-reported
3 Blueberries — Bugenhagen Not specified 20–30% more fruit over 2 seasons. Grower-reported, multi-season
3 Squash — Troy North Carolina 2–3x bigger and fuller plants. Grower-reported field comparison
3 Cabbage Hail Recovery Midwest ~25% yield recovery post-hail. Grower-reported, anonymized
4 Scotch Bonnet — Hampshire Trelawney, Jamaica Stronger root mass, heat resilience. Ongoing pilot
4 Mixed-Site Testing Multiple sites ~50% bean yield. Peppers 35% longer. Field observations
The Next Step

If one of these case studies fits your operation, let's talk.

The first conversation is short. We'll talk about your crop, your system, and the result you're trying to achieve. If EcoFlourish doesn't belong in your operation, we'll tell you.

For agronomists and advisors: request the technical brief